BRADLEY UNIVERSITY SENATE
AGENDA
SECOND MEETING OF THE 1997-98 SENATE
DECEMBER 10, 1997
3:10 p.m.
STUDENT CENTER BALLROOM
I. Call to order
II. Announcements
III. Approval of Minutes
A. Third regular meeting of the 1996-97 Session, November 20, 1997 (pp. 2-17)
IV. Call for Items to be added to Agenda
V. Reports from Administrators
A. President Brazil
B. Provost Murphy
VI. Reports from Standing Committees [If there is no page number listed after the committee, the report was not received in time for duplicating. Please check the Senate web site for additional reports (under "Academics" at Bradley's web site)]
VIII. Old Business
IX. New Business
X. Other Business
XI. Adjournment
PLEASE JOIN US FOR REFRESHMENTS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE MEETING
BRADLEY UNIVERSITY SENATE 1997-1998
MINUTES
THIRD REGULAR MEETING, November 20, 1997
The third meeting of the 1997-1998 University Senate was called to order in the Student Center Ballroom at 3:20 P.M.
Nina Collins moved the approval of the minutes and Larry Aspin seconded the motion. Amir Al-Khafaji made a correction to the minutes to reflect his statements regarding the evaluation tool for evaluating Chairs. The minutes were approved with the additions.
IV. CALL FOR ITEMS TO BE ADDED TO AGENDA
There will be an addition of item B under VI. Reports from Standing Committees.
Provost Murphy gave the Presidents report and her report. President Brazil was in Washington, D.C. testifying in support of the Higher Education Act reauthorization.
All faculty were thanked via the senators for participation in Founder’s Day and the other celebrations of the Centennial . Provost Murphy announced that Lydia Moss Bradley will soon be inducted into the National Women’s Hall of Fame in Seneca Falls, New York.
With six months to go we continue to make progress in reaching the $100,000,000 goal. There will be an announcement in a few weeks with will put the figure very near the goal total.
The faculty were also thanked for their participation in the United Way campaign.
Zeev Gorin moved approval of the minor modification to the political science curriculum. Samuel Fan seconded the motion. The motion passed.
Zeev Gorin requested that in the future that we receive material prior to the meeting.
Peggy Carter moved the approval of the minor addition to Professional Writing and Kurt Field seconded the motion. The motion passed.
A. Provost Search Committee - Joe Emanuel reported that all activity to date has been with the agreement of all Committee members and the President. There will be two candidates interviewed in the next two weeks. Gale Sullenberger will be interviewed November 24 and Kathleen Mailer will be interviewed December 1. Curriculum vitae will be available at the circulation desk in the library.
He indicated that all technology available to the Committee has been used
B. Faculty Handbook Committee – Conley Stutz stated that a search button has been placed on the web site for the handbook to permit easier review of the handbook and letting persons read selected areas if they do not wish to read the entire document. The document can be found at http://www.bradley.bradley.edu/academics/fachandbook.
The senators were charged with reviewing the Handbook and providing the following feedback: 1. Editorial changes, 2. Senate’s role in Handbook changes and purview, e.g., what is contractual and the Senate should handle and what sections do not fall within the purview of the Senate, and 3. What items are informational, only. Are there items we feel are not within the purview of the Senate and should not be in the Handbook.
Zeev Gorin asked if the Committee shouldn’t be responsible for bringing forth the concerns and discuss them before a vote, since the Committee had already become familiar with the document. Mr. Stutz indicated they now needed the input from the senators and other faculty.
Bernie Goitein stated that we would be looking for guidance from the Committee since they had reviewed the document.
Mr. Stutz gave examples of hours in the library. We do not approve the hours, however, it was important for the library to report to the Senate any changes in hours as there was not another body to which the library would report such changes. Section V items, e.g. facilities, library, information technologies are all being considered as to purview of the Senate. There have been questions raised as to areas which at one time were considered within the purview of the Senate.
Gary Anna indicated that any policies passed by the Senate which could affect other persons, professional staff and support staff, usually changes as appropriate. However, not every decision affects other persons as each group has their own handbook.
There is a December 2 deadline to receive the feedback. Mr. Stutz said if the comments are a bit late that would be okay.
There will be an opportunity for discussion at the meeting when the document is presented.
Richard Stallings moved to amend the motion so that each time an Associate Provost position is made, the position must be brought forth to the Senate for consideration. The amendment was to "retain the language of the original Article II and add to it after the word "resources" the words, "the Associate Provost for Enrollment Management." The reason was to avoid having the faculty to administrator ratio too different from the current ratio.
The motion as amended was passed.
Claire Etaugh moved the proposal to eliminate classes on Labor Day. Joan Sattler seconded the motion.
Discussion centered on the need to have at least two days to assist the students with adjustment to the university. Mr. Galsky spoke on behalf of this concept, suggesting that Study day be moved. Concern was raised in being able to grade examinations and figuring grades in time to meet the current deadlines. James Hansen suggested beginning the student activities on Wednesday and beginning classes on Monday. Peggy Carter raised the question of the possibility of moving the dates for turning-in grades to later the next week. Marc Adelman, student senator, stated the importance of the two days of getting the students acquainted with college, especially for freshmen and transfer students.
The motion failed.
The meeting adjourned at 4:42 P.M. and followed with a report by Gary Anna on the financial state of the University.
Respectfully submitted,
Mary Jo Mays, Secretary
University Senate
Addendum to the September 18, 1997 Minutes.
Under item IX. D. Amir Al-Khafaji stated the Instrument could be abused by administrators. Such instruments were used in the past, in his case, without his knowledge. Also, when he raised issue with the Dean to share the specifics the information has not been taken seriously, "…well they really just say that you work too hard or you're nice, …" it is taken as a joke. "I have never yet received a serious response from any of the deans and I’ve had four."
9798sen3.min
Faculty
(please initial)
|
Ahn, In Soo |
|
|
Al-Khafaji, Amir |
X |
|
Armmer, Fran |
X |
|
Aspin, Larry |
X |
|
Augustine, Colleen |
X |
|
Baer, Rob |
|
|
Berube, Lionel |
|
|
Bhandari, Shyam |
X |
|
Bowers, William |
X |
|
Bukowski, Charles |
X |
|
Cain, Mary |
X |
|
Carter, Peggy |
X |
|
Cisneros, Adolfo |
X |
|
Collins, Nina |
X |
|
Conley, Tim |
|
|
Fan, Sam |
X |
|
Field, Kurt |
X |
|
Frey, Charles |
X |
|
Gardner, Lisa |
X |
|
Goitein, Bernie |
X |
|
Gorin, Zeev |
X |
|
Gullifor, Paul |
|
|
Hansen, James |
X |
|
Haverhals, John |
X |
|
Heinemann, Steve |
X |
|
Helenek, Henry |
|
|
Holder, Teresa |
X |
|
Jost, John |
X |
|
Jungck, Jerry |
X |
|
Kassel, Paul |
|
|
Kroll, Dennis |
X |
|
Maskarinec, Martin |
X |
|
Mays, Mary Jo |
X |
|
Mehta, Paul |
X |
|
Ness, Arnold |
X |
|
Perry, Sandra |
X |
|
Petravick, Simon |
X |
|
Prasad, Vinod |
|
|
Roos, Kelly |
X |
|
Stalling, Richard |
X |
|
Stolz, Fisher |
X |
|
Tayyari, Fred |
|
|
Templeton, Rosalyn |
X |
|
Thorson, Doug |
X |
|
Wolffe, Robert |
X |
EX-OFFICIO
(please initial)
|
Anderson, Suzanne |
X |
|
Anna, Gary |
X |
|
Brazil, John |
|
|
Claussen, Neal |
|
|
Etaugh, Claire |
X |
|
Fakheri, Ahmad |
X |
|
Francis, John |
X |
|
Galik, Barbara |
X |
|
Galsky, Alan |
X |
|
Huberman, Jeffrey |
X |
|
Lumpkin, James |
X |
|
Mordosky, Anthony |
X |
|
Murphy, Sharon |
X |
|
Sattler, Joan |
X |
|
Shorrock, John |
Students
(please initial)
|
Adelman, Marc |
X |
|
Keyster, Eric |
|
November 12, 1997
To: The University Senate
From: C&R Subcommittee on Curriculum
The Subcommittee on Curriculum reviewed and approved the requests noted below. These were forwarded to the Curriculum and Regulations Committee for appropriate action and were subsequently approved. The following summary of approvals is provided for your action/information.
Henry P. Slane College of Communications & Fine Arts
Major Modifications
BA/BS in Studio Art
BA/BS in Art Education
This proposal modifies the BA/BS majors in Studio Art and in Art Education by reducing the number of hours from 66 to 54. It reconfigures specified courses to include an additional drawing course. The proposal is being made in response to these three items:
The proposal has been constructed in consultation with the Education Department. (Art Education methods course forms are being prepared separately.)
The catalog material is being modified by changing Teacher Certification to Art Education Major, Teacher Certification, K-12 or Secondary Certification.
The note at the end of the catalog material will read: This degree requires a minimum of 139-146 hrs. to complete. It is also possible to earn a BFA degree with teacher certification. However, both options will require more than four years of study.
COURSE MODIFICATIONS
ART 101, Drawing I, 3 sh
Course Description: Fundamental concepts and techniques in drawing, using a variety of media and tools. Develop skills based on drawing from observation and invention.
Current number, title: ART 103, Creative Drawing
Current Description:, Basic drawing materials and techniques; contemporary concepts.
ART 380, Topics: Specified, 3 sh
Course Description: Topics of special interest which may vary each time course is offered. Topic stated in current Academic Handbook. May be repeated under different topics. Emphasis on individual research.
Prerequisites: Junior standing and/or consent of instructor. See current Academic handbook.
Current Description: Topics of special interest which may vary each time course is offered. Topic stated in current Academic handbook. Emphasis on individual research.
ART 470, Topics: 20th Century Art, 3 sh
Course Description: Topics of special interest which may vary each time course is offered. Topic stated in current Academic Handbook. May be repeated under different topics. Emphasis on individual research.
Prerequisites: Junior standing and consent of instructor. See current Academic Handbook.
Current Description: Topics of special interest which may vary each time course is offered. Topic stated in current Academic Handbook. Emphasis on individual research.
ART 420, B.F.A. Seminar I, 2 sh
Course Description: Professional orientation and career preparation through concentrated studio production, exhibition management, creative media research, critique analysis, on-site visitation of artist’s studios, formulation of artist thesis statement and resume.
Prerequisistes: BFA candidacy, senior standing; or consent of instructor & advisor.
Current title: B.F.A. Senior Studio, 3 sh
Current Description: Professional orientation and career preparation through concentrated studio production; directed by major professor and assisted by faculty committee. Exhibition management, critiques, research, written artists’ statement, portfolio.
COURSE ADDITIONS
ART 421, B.F.A. Seminar II, 1 sh
Course Description: Continuation of ART 420: resume and portfolio preparation, exhibition design management, culminating B.F.A. exhibition.
Prerequisistes; ART 420 or consent of instructor
ART 102, Drawing II, 3 sh
Course Description: Second part of a year-long course on developing fundamental concepts and techniques in drawing using a variety of media and tools. Developing objective and subjective use of imagery. Introduction to the human figure.
Prerequisistes: ART 101 or consent of instructor. not open to students with credit in ART 104, Figure Drawing.
ART 230, Life Drawing, 3 sh
Course Description: Drawing the figure from observation; learning anatomy to describe the dynamic qualities of the human form employing basic drawing elements, methods, and materials.
Prerequisistes: ART 102 or consent of instructor; not open to students with credit in ART 203, Figure Drawing.
MUS 350, Intermediate Music Technology, 3 sh
Course Description: Continuation of MUS 250. Emphasis on computer applications, recording, and the Internet.
Prerequisistes: MUS 250
CFA 211, 212, Dance, 1-2 sh
Course Description: Dance lessons and rehearsal on campus and/or with the Peoria Ballet, for qualified students; audition may be required. Each may be repeated for a maximum of eight hours.
Prerequisistes: Consent of instructor
COURSE DELETIONS
ART 104, Figure Drawing, 3 sh
Course Description: Basic drawing concepts as related to the figure.
ART 203, Drawing Studio, 3 sh
Course Description: Visual perception and analysis through drawing in variety of techniques involving line area, and ground. Figure, still-life, and landscape drawing from direct observation and from imagination. (Serves as sophomore basic course for graphic design). Includes referral studios under advisement.
ART 370, Topics: 20th Century Art, 3 sh
Course Description: Topics of special interest which may vary each time course is offered. Topic stated in current Academic Handbook.
College of Liberal Arts & Sciences
Minor Modification
Political Science
This modification is being requested to bring the requirements for the minor in Political Science in line with changes within the department and curriculum. Courses have been added and the emphases of some courses have been modified. This modification will reflect these changes by
Minor Addition
Professional Writing
This minor is proposed to provide a minor to students interested in a program to prepare for jobs or careers requiring analytical/discursive writing and editing skills. The minor will be titled "Professional Writing" to distinguish it from the "Creative Writing" minor. Professional Writing is writing in the contexts of professions, disciplines, and organizations. The subject includes the traditional composition fields of technical and business writing and the emerging field of writing in organizations. The minor is intended to supplement a student’s major by helping the student prepare for a writing-intensive career or job. There is anticipated enrollment of between 10 to 15 students. The students will be taking courses offered regularly to other student populations allowing the department to handle the increased enrollment with current staffing. Students electing this minor will be assigned a faculty advisor to help design the program for individual needs. The program is balanced between courses emphasizing historical or theoretical approaches to languages.
COURSE MODIFICATIONS
HIS 322, History of England, 3 sh
Course Description: From earliest times to the present. Not open to students with credit in HIS 345 or HIS 346.
Current Description: From earliest times to the present.
PSY 405, Issues in Applied Psychology, 1-3 sh
Course description: Study of special issues related to applied psychology, which may vary each time course is offered. Topic stated in current Academic Handbook. May be repeated under a different topic for a maximum of 6 hours credit.
Prerequisistes: 9 hrs. of psychology.
Current Title: Special Topics in Psychology
ENG 492, Practicum in English, 1-3 sh
Course Description: Supervised writing projects in connection with student service, volunteer, or work activities. Pass/Fail
Prerequisistes: Completion of junior-level composition requirement (C-2); consent of Department Chair
Current Description: Supervised work study in community service activities. Pass/Fail
Current Prerequisites: Consent of Department Chair
COURSE ADDITIONS
PSY 406, Issues in Theoretical Psychology, 1-3 sh
Course Description: Study of special issues related to theoretical and experimental psychology, which may vary each time the course is offered. Topic stated in current Academic Handbook. May be repeated under different topics for a maximum of 6 hours of credit.
Prerequisites: 9 hrs. of psychology or consent of the instructor
HIS 345, The History of England I, 3 sh
Course Description: From 55 BC to 1660. Not open to students with credit in HIS 322.
HIS 346, History of England II, 3 sh
Course Description: From 1660 to the present. Not open to students with credit in HIS 322.
Foster College of Business Administration
COURSE MODIFICATIONS
BMA 272, Management Applications of Personal Computers, 3 sh
Course Description: Survey of computer applications in business, personal computers, and business information systems. Emphasis on personal computer applications from the perspective of the individual user. Intermediate-level software packages.
Prerequisistes: BMA 172 or successful completion of Foster College of Business Administration computer proficiency exams.
Current prerequisistes: BMA 172
C&R Subcommittee on Curriculum
Doan Modianos
Howard Goldbaum
Rita Jensen
F. Eugene Rebholz
Dohn DePinto
John Francis, Chair
November 12, 1997
To: Sandra Perry, President of University Senate
From: Neal Claussen, Archivist
Below is a year by year summary of the membership of the University Senate in the last ten years. The numbers were taken from the membership rosters for each year. I did not go through all the minutes to see if there were additions and deletions. I noted that Brendan Liddell was not listed as Parliamentarian from 1988 through 1991. I am 98% sure he was a voting member of the Senate during that period. If so, the number of faculty should be increased by one. Also note that the percent of Senate being faculty increased by three percent since 1988 and the percent of the Senate being administration decreased by two percent in that period. Here are my findings:
1997-98 46 faculty (72%) 1992-93 41 faculty (70%)
4 students 4 students
14 administration (22%) 14 administration (24%)
64 total 59 total
1996-97 46 faculty (72%) 1991-92 40 faculty (69%)
4 students 4 students
14 administration (22%) 14 administration (24%)
64 total 58 total
1995-96 47 faculty (71%) 1990-91 40 faculty (69%)
4 students 4 students
14 administration (22%) 14 administration (24%)
65 total 58 total
1994-95 45 faculty (71%) 1989-90 40 faculty (69%)
4 students 4 students
14 administration 14 administration (24%)
63 total 58 total
1993-94 45 faculty (71%) 1988-89 40 faculty (69%)
4 students 4 students
14 administration (22%) 14 administration (24%)
63 total 58 total
DATE: December 1, 1997
FROM: Senate Executive Committee
RE: Composition of the Senate Executive Committee
Following discussions with several Past Presidents of the Bradley University Senate, we recommend that the immediate Past President of the University Senate serve as a member of the Senate Executive Committee and as an ex officio member of the University Senate.
We offer the following formal motion for consideration and action:
The Executive Committee shall consist of the President of the Senate who shall serve as Chairperson, the Vice President of the Senate, the Secretary of the Senate, the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs, the immediate Past President of the Senate, and two members elected from the elected Senate membership. The immediate Past President of the University Senate shall be an ex officio member of the Senate.
The changed copy, from the Bradley University Senate Constitution Article V, Section 2, pt. 2, would read: (proposed new language shown by underlining) The Executive Committee shall consist of the President of the Senate who shall serve as Chairperson, the Vice President of the Senate, the Secretary of the Senate, the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs, the immediate Past President of the Senate, and two members elected from the elected Senate membership. In addition, Article II, Section 1, pt. 1 would read: The President and Vice Presidents of the University, Deans of Colleges and the Graduate School, the Associate Provost for Student Affairs, the Associate Provost for Information Technologies and Resources, the Associate Provost for Enrollment Management, the Registrar, and the immediate Past President of the Senate shall be ex officio members of the University Senate.
To: University Senate
From: Tenure, Promotion and Dismissal Committee
Re: Proposal extending probationary period
Rationale for a Policy for Extending the Probationary Period
The plan we are proposing is "family friendly" yet it does not extend the probationary period beyond the AAUP accepted seven years. It is not to replace medical, unpaid, and Family Lave Act leaves which neither count for or against probationary years. The intent is to make it possible for individuals to care for their health and that of those dependent on them while at the same time continuing in their position at the university without further jeopardizing their chances of getting tenure. The plan is not to be used to extend the probationary period for cases where insufficient progress toward tenure cannot be proven to be directly attributable to one of the circumstances indicated in the proposal.
Handbook Copy
Chapter II. Faculty
B. Tenure
...
6. A Policy for Extending the Probationary Period
Faculty members may be granted, upon request, a single one year extension of the probationary period (not to be confused with a leave of absence) under the following circumstances:
a) Care of a child, adoption of a child under six years of age, and birth of a
child.
b) Need to devote substantial time to the care of any person dependent on
the faculty member who is diseased, ill or injured.
c) Disease, illness, or injury debilitating the probationary faculty member.
In each of the circumstances listed above it is expected that the faculty member is employed full-time and will continue to perform his or her duties as specified in the "Faculty Workload Policy".
A request to extend the probationary period should be made to the department chairperson in writing no later than April first prior to the final year of the probationary period. The department chairperson will forward the request to the tenure committee of the department for its consideration. This committee will forward to the chairperson the vote and the explanation to substantiate the recommendation. The chairperson will then forward the committee results along with his or her recommendation to the dean who will forward this documentation along with his or her recommendation to the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs who will render a final decision. This decision should reach the faculty member no later than 30 days from the date the department chairperson receives the request. All appeals of the decision of the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs will be made through the normal grievance procedures.
December 2, 1997
TO : University Senate
FROM : Admissions & Retention Committee
RE : Semi-Annual Report
The Admissions & Retention Committee was asked to meet and discuss how Bradley University is dealing with students who have documented learning disabilities.
After meeting with Carolyn Griffith, the Committee learned that most of the questions that had been asked of us had already been addressed in a report from President Brazil in March of 1996.
Respectfully submitted,
Charlotte Awl
Mary Ann Carroll
Kyle Dzapo
Ken Harding
Herb Kasube (Chair)
Doan Modianos
Terry Nighswanger
Sang Yoon (student)
December 3, 1997
To: University Senate
From: Donna Konradi, Chairperson
Student Grievance Committee
The Student Grievance committee had an organizational meeting on November 12, 1997. We discussed the purpose of the committee and the changes in the Handbook. To date, there are no grievances that have been forwarded to this committee.
December 1, 1997
To: The University Senate
From: University Elections Committee
Re: Semi-Annual report of the activities of the University Elections Committee
The committee conducted the fall elections for positions on the Contractual Arrangements Committee, Faculty Grievance Committee, and Committee on Tenure, Promotion and Dismissal.
The committee is considering proposing a universal set of election procedures that all colleges would follow when electing members to University Senate and its committees. This proposal will probably be brought to the Senate in the spring of 1998.
Respectfully Submitted
Larry Aspin, Chair
Margaret Carter
Nina Collins
Robert Wolfe
December 1, 1997
Re: Affirmative Action Committee Semi-annual Report
The committee has met monthly during the semester. Besides co-sponsoring the Day of Dialogue in October, the committee has held discussions with the President and with the Registrar. Future meetings with the Associate Provost for Enrollment Management and jointly with other committees are being planned for Spring. In these actions the Committee is focusing on determining where it can be pro-active with various other campus bodies in fulfilling its mission.
Seth Katz
Dennis Kroll, chair
Karni Tiernan
Helja Robinson
Dawn Roberts
Ray Wojcikewych
Clarence Brown
Stacey Robertson
Huong Vu
December 1, 1997
TO: University Senate
FROM: Ahmad Fakheri, Chair
Executive Committee of the Graduate Faculty
The Executive Committee of the Graduate Faculty and the Curriculum and Regulations Committee have reviewed and approved the following and respectfully requests the approval of the University Senate:
Course Addition
ME 560 Principles of Robotic Programming 3 hrs.
IME 560 Principles of Robotic Programming 3 hrs.
TO: Sandra Perry, President
University Senate
FROM: Sharon Murphy, Chair
University Strategic Planning Committee
DATE: December 5, 1997
RE: Semi-Annual Report of the University Strategic Planning Committee
The Committee met and agreed that, given the examination of curriculum and potential curricular innovations considered in the past two years, it is not advisable to begin a systematic series of individual program reviews at this time.
Task Forces have begun the work of planning implementation of several of the Key Strategies. The Task Force for Globalization and Diversification Strategy is meeting and is expected to bring its initial recommendations to the Strategic Planning Committee in spring. The Task Force for the Connected Learning Community Strategy will begin its work soon and has as a major objective the building of a comprehensive technology masterplan for the campus.
As requested, the review of the General Education Curriculum has been begun, under the leadership of Dr. Jerry Hahn.
Respectfully submitted:
Sharon Murphy, Chair Y. B. Safdari
Linda Anglin Joan Sattler
Gary Anna Robert Scott
Margaret Carter John Shorrock
William Hall Charles Stoner
Brian Huggins Flecia Thomas
Ed Lamoureux
Megan Mahony
James Miller
Barbara Penelton
Sandra Perry
TO: Sandra Perry, President
University Senate
FROM: Sharon Murphy, Chair
Honorary Degrees Committee
DATE: December 5, 1997
RE: Semi-Annual Report of the Honorary Degrees Committee
The Committee again invited suggestions and nominations from the University Community. Nominated, approved and confirmed as honorary degree recipient and commencement speaker for December 1997 is Dr. Stanley O. Ikenberry, President of the American Council on Education.
Nominations for May 1998 are proceeding.
Respectfully Submitted:
Sharon Murphy, Chair
Winfred Anakwa
Claire Etaugh
Jeff Huberman
Tim Maga
Nancy Sherman
Doug Thorson
TO: Sandra Perry, President
University Senate
FROM: Sharon Murphy, Chair
University Senate Committee on Curriculum and
Regulations
DATE: December 5, 1997
RE: Semi-Annual Report of the University Senate
Committee on Curriculum and Regulations
The Committee conducted its usual activities of reviewing changes to additions, modifications, and deletions of courses.
There were several major program modifications as well as minor program modifications and additions in different colleges.
A General Education Report was submitted and will be discussed next semester.
Interim scheduling, honors for graduate students at Commencement, and bookstore policy on "complimentary" copies were also discussed.
December 1, 1997
To: The University Senate
From: Contractual Arrangements Committee
Re: Semi-Annual report of the activities of the Contractual
Arrangements Committee
The committee has several agenda items; however three ongoing items consumed most of the committee’s time during the fall semester.
1. The committee solicited input from various sources (e.g., open university meeting, executive committees, Deans Council) on the option to extend the probationary period of tenure track faculty members. While almost all were supportive of the policy, there were several constructive suggestions. The committee revised the proposal and placed it before the University Senate at the November meeting. It will be voted on at the December meeting.
2. The committee continued its work on the unresolved retirement issues.
While the administration was not prepared to implement the committee’s proposals this fall, the committee hopes to continue working with the administration to improve the university’s below average position on TIAA contributions.
3. The committee is investigating whether or not there were any changes in tuition remission policy.
Respectfully Submitted
Larry Aspin, Chair
Kurt Field
Lisa Gardner
Pratima Gandhi
Conley Stutz
Policy for Extending the Probationary Period
Proposed Changes to the Printed Copy of the Faculty Handbook (Current
Content) (Proposed Additions)
Chapter III. Faculty Status
…
B. Faculty Appointment, Evaluation, Tenure, Promotion and Dismissal
…
2. Policies and Procedures for Appointment, Promotion, Tenure and Dismissal.
…
b. Probationary Appointments Leading Towards Tenure
…
10) A Policy for Extending the Probationary Period
Faculty members may be granted, upon request, a single one year extension of the probationary period (not to be confused with a leave of absence) under the following circumstances:
a) Care of a child, adoption of a child under six years of age, or birth of a child.
b) Need to devote substantial time to the care of a diseased, ill or injured person.
c) Disease, illness, or injury debilitating the probationary faculty member.
In each of the circumstances listed above it is expected that the faculty member is employed full-time and will continue to perform his or her duties as specified in the "Faculty Workload Policy".
A request to extend the probationary period should be made to the department chairperson in writing no later than April first prior to the final year of the probationary period. The department chairperson will forward the request to the tenure committee of the department for its consideration. This committee will forward to the chairperson the vote and the explanation to substantiate the recommendation. The chairperson will then forward the committee results along with his or her recommendation to the dean who will forward this documentation along with his or her recommendation to the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs who will render a final decision. This decision should reach the faculty member no later than 30 days from the date the department chairperson receives the request. All appeals of the decision of the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs will be made through the normal grievance procedures.
Approving the above policy then requires an additional clarification be
added to the handbook
Chapter III. Faculty Status
…
B. Faculty Appointment, Evaluation, Tenure, Promotion and Dismissal
…
2. Policies and Procedures for Appointment, Promotion, Tenure and Dismissal.
…
b. Probationary Appointments Leading Towards Tenure
…
6) A faculty member in the probationary period must be notified not later than March 1 of the sixth year of service with the University if the faculty member will or will not be offered tenure at the beginning of the seventh year. If tenure is not granted the faculty member will be offered a one year terminal contract for the seventh year. The signing of the terminal contract does not diminish in any way the faculty member’s right to appeal the tenure decision.
A faculty member who has been granted a one year extension of the probationary period according to the policy on extending the probationary period must be notified not later than March 1 of the seventh year of service with the University whether the faculty member will or will not be offered tenure at the beginning of the eighth year. If tenure is not granted, the faculty member will be offered a one year terminal contract for the eighth year.
December 8, 1997
To: University Senate
From: Committee on University Resources
Re: Semi-annual report
The Committee on University Resources met several times during the fall
semester. The primary effort of the committee members during this semester
was to formulate a plan that will allow the committee to identify
and propose specific funding recommendations to the Senate by the end
of next semester. The recommendations will fall within the framework
of the key strategies identified in the USPC report approved by the Senate
last semester. Once the committee members finalize the plan, it will be
presented to the Senate Executive Committee for review before implementation
Members of the Committee on University Resources
Shyam Bhandari
Chang Ok Choi
Rick Goldhammer
Steve Heinemann
Henry Helenek
Brian Huggins
Brad Marshall (student member)
TO: Sandra Perry, President of the University Senate
FROM: Joe Felder
R.E.: Tenure, Promotion, and Dismissal Committee
DATE: December 5, 1997
The Tenure, Promotion, and Dismissal Committee has met.
Mainly for the benefit of new members who have never served on this committee before, we discussed the charge of the committee and its history.
We elected Joseph Felder to be chair.