Program Outcomes
Council On Social Work Education - Form AS 4(B)
Bradley University Baccalaureate Social Work Program
Assessment Of Student Learning Outcomes
Form AS 4(B): A form required for Reaffirmation, Candidacy, and ongoing compliance per AS 4.0.3.
Submitting Form AS 4 for Reaffirmation Self-Study & Candidacy Benchmarks
This form is used to assist the COA in the evaluation of the program’s compliance with the accreditation standard below:
- 4.0.3: The program uses Form AS 4(B) and/or Form AS 4(M) to report its most recent assessment outcomes for each program option to constituents and the public on its website and routinely up-dates (minimally every 2 years) its findings.
All programs accredited by the Council on Social Work Education’s Commission on Accreditation (COA) are required to measure and report student learning outcomes. All students are assessed using a minimum of two measures on their mastery of the nine competencies that comprise the Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards (EPAS) and any additional competencies programs may choose to add. These holistic competencies reflect the dimensions (knowledge, values, skills, and cognitive & amp;affective processes) of social work practice that all social workers are expected to master during their professional training.
Programs determine a percentage-based benchmark for each competency and determine an outcome-measure benchmark (minimum score) for each measure. The competency benchmark (which can differ for each competency) represents the minimum percent of students the program expects to have achieved the outcome measure benchmarks in both/all measures for each of the nine competencies. The program then determines the percentage of students that attained each outcome measure (e.g., minimum score or higher), and aggregates the percentages for both/all measures together to obtain the percentage of students demonstrating competence inclusive of two (2) or more measures. The result of aggregating both/all outcome measure percentages provides the percentage of students achieving the competency benchmark. An aggregated percentage at or above the competency benchmark is considered achievement of that competency. If the program has more than one program option, the program must report data for each program option, and also an aggregate of all program options combined to determine an overall percentage of students across all program options achieving the competency benchmark.
Posting Form AS 4 for Ongoing Compliance with AS 4.0.3
Per the requirement of CSWE COA’s recognizing body, the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA), and accreditation standard 4.0.3, programs must post this form publicly on its website and routinely up-date (minimally every 2 years) its findings. Upon request, programs must provide CSWE with the weblink to the published form on the program’s website where it is accessible to the public. Data presented on the form must be collected within 2 years of today’s date at all times.
Summary of the Program’s Assessment Plan | Generalist Practice
All students are assessed using a minimum of two measures on their mastery of the nine competencies that comprise the Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards of the Council on Social Work Education and any additional competencies programs may choose to add. Summarize the program’s competency-based assessment plan. Programs may add/delete rows to accurately reflect the number measures included in the data presented.
Assessment Measure #1: FIELD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION | ||
---|---|---|
Dimension(s) assessed: | Knowledge, Skills, Values, Cognitive/Affective Processes | |
When/where students are assessed: | At the end of the field practicum; Assessed in field agency (real setting) in conjunction with field placement/practicum | |
Who assessed student competence: |
Field Practicum Instructor |
|
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9. | Students must score a minimum of 4 out of 5 on a 5-point rating scale (4=superior performance, 5=mastered performance) | |
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9. | 80% of students will demonstrate competence by meeting or exceeding the outcome measure benchmark |
Assessment Measure #2: COURSE ASSIGNMENTS | ||
---|---|---|
Dimension(s) assessed: | Knowledge | |
When/where students are assessed: | At the end of the semester upon course completion; Assessed in the classroom | |
Who assessed student competence: | Faculty teaching courses with assessment measures | |
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9. | Students must score a minimum of 4 out of 5 on a 5-point rating scale (4=proficient, 5=advanced) | |
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9. | 80% of students will demonstrate competence by meeting or exceeding the outcome measure benchmark |
Assessment Measure #3: FIELD PORTFOLIO | ||
---|---|---|
Dimension(s) assessed: | Knowledge, Skills, Values, Cognitive/Affective Processes | |
When/where students are assessed: | At the end of the field practicum; Assessed in field seminar in conjunction with field placement/practicum | |
Who assessed student competence: | Field Director/Field Seminar Instructor | |
Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9. | Students must score a minimum of 4 out of 5 on a 5-point rating scale (4=proficient, 5=advanced) | |
Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9. | 80% of students will demonstrate competence by meeting or exceeding the outcome measure benchmark |
Assessment Data Collected during the Academic Year (Fall 2021-Spring 2022)
COMPETENCY | COMPETENCY BENCHMARK(%) | PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS ACHIEVING BENCHMARK | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aggregate Combined Measures n = varies |
Field Instructor Evaluation n = 18 |
Course Measures n = varies | Field Practicum Portfolio n = 20 |
||
Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior | 80% inclusive of both measures | 100% (n=34) | 100% | 100% (n=10) | 100% |
Competency 2: Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice | 80% inclusive of both measures | 97% (n=34) | 100% | 90% (n=10) | 100% |
Competency 3: Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice | 80% inclusive of both measures | 99% (n=30) | 100% | 97% (n=6) | 100% |
Competency 4: Engage in Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice | 80% inclusive of both measures | 98% (n=48) | 100% | 94% (n=24) | |
Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice | 99% (n=30) | 100% | 97% (n=6) | 100% | |
Competency 6: Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities | 80% inclusive of both measures | 98% (n=59) | 100% | 97% (n=35) | 100% |
Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities | 80% inclusive of both measures | 96% (n=59) | 100% | 98% (n=35) | 100% |
Competency 8: Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities | 80% inclusive of both measures | 98% (n=59) | 100% | 94% (n=35) | 100% |
Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities | 80% inclusive of both measures | 98% (n=48) | 100% | 94% (n=24) | 100% |